-
Website
http://blog.fosketts.net/ -
Original page
http://blog.fosketts.net/2008/09/14/turning-page-raid/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ampressman
1 comment · 5 points
-
hsus2k
8 comments · 1 points
-
the storage anarchist
2 comments · 1 points
-
spiceyweasel
7 comments · 1 points
-
chris1776
2 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Flush Time
2 weeks ago · 4 comments
-
The Dumb Disk Fallacy
3 weeks ago · 5 comments
-
Got Excess Money? Upgrade Your 2009 Mac Mini RAM To 8 GB!
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Late 2009 Mac Mini: Apple’s Inexpensive Server
2 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
We Hold These (Storage) Truths…
3 weeks ago · 3 comments
-
Flush Time
Good article on RAID. My comment: not so fast. RAID5/6 implementations based on Patterson et.al. are still being heavily purchased and deployed in the industry. One reason: the mathematical lookup of data, as described by Patterson, is not only fast, but more importantly, it's trusted. Customers are cognizant of the value of this direct mapping. Virtualizing the location of customer data has its place (e.g. enabling snaps), but mathematical lookup will continue to be a valuable role at the very bottom of the stack.
Keep up the interesting posts,
Steve
Great point! I'm very much a pragmatist, as are most successful storage managers. They'll continue to use what works long into the future, even as new ideas come and go. But let me be clear - this is the end for RAID tied to specific whole disks. We'll continue to see RAID 5 and RAID 6 (and RAID 1) based on subdisks (as in DMX et al) but devices like the CLARiiON will give up their strict disk-centric model. In my opinion, of course!
Stephen