<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat - Latest Comments in SRM For VMware (Thank God!)</title><link>http://fosketts.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://fosketts.disqus.com/srm_for_vmware_thank_god/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:29:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: SRM For VMware (Thank God!)</title><link>http://blog.fosketts.net/2007/08/01/srm-for-vmware-thank-god/#comment-3765197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Stepehen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd look more closely at this announcement to see what's really there before getting too excited.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have no hard evidence, but consider the following:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- VMware support is very hot in the market right now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- the SRM market share leader (EMC) announced full-featured support for VMware in ControlCenter 6.0, so they have to respond in some fashion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- doing end-to-end SRM in VMware turned out to be really, really hard: discovery, visualization, new forms of reporting at multiple levels, provisioning, et. al.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't want to take anything away from the Symantec guys, but I want to make sure that they're not getting away with a bit of marketing puffery here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chuck Hollis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:29:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>